MichaelJay
07-07-2008, 06:50 PM
Hello,
one of the groups we have in Cerberus is setup to handle abuse messages. Some people bounce abuse issues with the original file as an attached .eml file (AOL). I can't find the headers for the attached file to get details. There doesn't seem to be a way to download or view the full file.
It appears that the attached file is shown inline as the message. This is nice from the stand point of being able to quickly see the message contents. How ever, "show full headers" shows the senders message headers as you would expect, not the attached EML file headers... and I don't see another way to view the attached file headers.
From an abuse standpoint this is essential, to be able to track down the path of a message, who sent it / from what IP, and what server relayed or received it etc.
How do we do this? Or would this fall under the feature request catagory?
Also, there isn't even an indicator that it's an attached file being displayed inline, which would also be handy to know, as opposed to thinking it's the actual message sent.
Thanks,
Michael Jay.
one of the groups we have in Cerberus is setup to handle abuse messages. Some people bounce abuse issues with the original file as an attached .eml file (AOL). I can't find the headers for the attached file to get details. There doesn't seem to be a way to download or view the full file.
It appears that the attached file is shown inline as the message. This is nice from the stand point of being able to quickly see the message contents. How ever, "show full headers" shows the senders message headers as you would expect, not the attached EML file headers... and I don't see another way to view the attached file headers.
From an abuse standpoint this is essential, to be able to track down the path of a message, who sent it / from what IP, and what server relayed or received it etc.
How do we do this? Or would this fall under the feature request catagory?
Also, there isn't even an indicator that it's an attached file being displayed inline, which would also be handy to know, as opposed to thinking it's the actual message sent.
Thanks,
Michael Jay.